Peer-Reviewed Publications

      Systematic review of the relation between smokeless tobacco and cancer of the pancreas in Europe and North America

      Sponsiello-Wang, Z.; Weitkunat, R.; Lee, P. N.

      Published
      Dec 1, 2008
      DOI
      10.1186/1471-2407-8-356
      PMID
      19046421
      Link to publication
      Topic
      Summary

      Background: Recent reviews claiming smokeless tobacco increases pancreatic cancer risk appear not to have considered all available epidemiological evidence; nor were meta-analyses included. We present a systematic review of studies from North America and Europe, since data are lacking from other continents. Risk is also difficult to quantify elsewhere due to the various products, compositions and usage practices involved. Methods: Epidemiological studies were identified that related pancreatic cancer to use of snuff, chewing tobacco or unspecified smokeless tobacco. Study details and effect estimates (relative risks or odds ratios) were extracted, and combined by meta-analyses. Results: Nine North American and two Scandinavian studies were identified. Reporting was limited in four studies, so only seven were included in meta-analyses, some providing results for never smokers, some for the overall population of smokers and non-smokers, and some for both. Giving preference to study-specific estimates for the overall population, if available, and for never smokers otherwise, the random-effects estimate for ever smokeless tobacco use was 1.03 (95% confidence interval 0.71-1.49) based on heterogeneous estimates from seven studies. The estimate varied little by continent, study type, or type of smokeless tobacco. Giving preference to estimates for never smokers, if available, and overall population estimates otherwise, the estimate was 1.14 (0.67-1.93), again based on heterogeneous estimates. Estimates varied (p = 0.014) between cohort studies (1.75, 1.20-2.54) and case-control studies (0.84, 0.36-1.97). The value for cohort studies derived mainly from one study, which reported an increase for never smokers (2.0, 1.2-3.3), but not overall (0.9, 0.7-1.2). This study also contributed to increases seen for snuff use and for European studies, significant only in fixed-effect analyses. The studies have various weaknesses, including few exposed cases, reliance in cohort studies on exposure recorded at baseline, poor control groups in some case-control studies, and lack of a dose-response. Publication bias, with some negative studies not being presented, is also possible. Conclusion: At most, the data suggest a possible effect of smokeless tobacco on pancreatic cancer risk. More evidence is needed. If any risk exists, it is highly likely to be less than that from smoking.

      Related Publications

      Comparison of Abdominal Aortic Aneurysm Growth in Adult Smoking Patients Who Either Switch to IQOS, Continue Smoking, or Quit Smoking

      Clinical

      Reduced exposure to Harmful and Potentially Harmful Constituents after 90 days of use of Tobacco Heating System 2.2 Menthol in Japan: A comparison with continued cigarette use or smoking abstinence

      Clinical

      Reduced Exposure To Harmful And Potentially Harmful Constituents after 90 Days Of Use Of Tobacco Heating System 2.2 Menthol In Japan: A Comparison With Continued Cigarette Use Or Smoking Abstinence

      Clinical

      Psychometric Evaluation of the mCEQ applied to Cigarettes and Heat-Not-Burn Products in the US and Japan

      Clinical

      Pharmacokinetics Of Nicotine And Subjective Effects Following The Single Use Of A Non-Menthol And Menthol Version Of Tobacco Heating System 2.2 In Two Studies In Japan: A Comparison With Single Use Of A Combustible Cigarette And Nicotine Gum

      Clinical

      Pharmacokinetics of Nicotine and Subjective Effects Following the Single Use of a Non-Menthol and Menthol Version of Tobacco Heating System 2.2 in Two Studies in Japan: A Comparison with Single Use of a Combustible Cigarette and Nicotine Gum

      Clinical

      PMIScience.com is operated by Philip Morris International for the purpose of publishing and disseminating scientific information about Philip Morris International’s efforts in support of its smoke-free product portfolio. This site is a global site for use by scientists, the public health and regulatory communities, and other stakeholders with an interest in tobacco policy. The purpose of this site is not advertising or marketing, nor is it directed at any specific market. It is not intended for use by consumers. New tobacco products sold in the United States are subject to FDA regulation; therefore the content of this site is not intended to make, and nor should it be construed as making, any product related claims in the United States without proper FDA authorization. ​
      ​
      Reduced Risk Products ("RRPs”) is the term we use to refer to products that present, are likely to present, or have the potential to present less risk of harm to smokers who switch to these products versus continuing smoking. PMI has a range of RRPs in various stages of development, scientific assessment and commercialization. All of our RRPs are smoke-free products that deliver nicotine with far lower quantities of harmful and potentially harmful constituents than found in cigarette smoke.