Peer-Reviewed Publications

      Reduction in exposure to selected harmful and potentially harmful constituents approaching those observed upon smoking abstinence in smokers switching to the menthol Tobacco Heating System 2.2 for three months (Part 1)

      Haziza, C.; de La Bourdonnaye, G.; Donelli, A.; Poux, V.; Skiada, D.; Weitkunat, R.; Baker, G.; Picavet, P.; Lüdicke, F.

      Published
      Feb 5, 2019
      DOI
      10.1093/ntr/ntz013
      PMID
      30722062
      Link to publication
      Topic
      Summary

      Introduction: The Tobacco Heating System (THS) is a “heat-not-burn” tobacco product designed to generate significantly lower levels of harmful and potentially harmful constituents (HPHCs) and present lower risk of harm than cigarettes. This study assessed the exposure reduction to selected HPHCs in smokers switching to menthol Tobacco Heating System (mTHS) 2.2 compared with smokers continuing smoking menthol cigarettes (mCCs) and smoking abstinence (SA) for 5 days in a confined setting, followed by an 86-day ambulatory period.

      Methods: A total of 160 healthy adult US smokers participated in this randomized, three-arm parallel group, controlled clinical study. Biomarkers of exposure to 16 HPHCs were measured in blood and 24-hour urine. Safety was monitored throughout the study. Information was also gathered on product evaluation, product use, subjective effects, and clinical risk markers (co-publication Part 2).

      Results: Nicotine uptake was comparable in both exposure groups (mTHS:mCC ratio of 96% on day 90). On day 5, biomarker of exposure levels to other HPHCs were reduced by 51%–96% in the mTHS group compared with the mCC group, and these reductions were sustained for most biomarkers of exposure over ambulatory period. After 90 days of use, the level of satisfaction with mTHS and suppression of urge to smoke were comparable to mCC.

      Conclusion: Switching from mCCs to mTHS significantly reduced the exposure to HPHCs to levels approaching those observed in subjects who abstained from smoking for the duration of the study.

      Implications: This study compared the impact of switching to mTHS on biomarkers of exposure, relative to continued smoking or SA.

      Clinical Significance

      • Switching to mTHS 2.2 led to significant reductions of exposure (total NNAL, total NNN, COHb, MHBMA, 3-HPMA, S-PMA, Total 1-OHP, 4-ABP, 1-NA, 2-NA, o-tol, CEMA, HEMA, HMPMA, and B[a]P) after 5 days in confinement, which were maintained throughout the subsequent ambulatory period of 86 days. The reductions were similar to those observed upon SA.

      • Moderate compliance in the mTHS group during the ambulatory period was indicative of dual use of mTHS and mCC.

      • mTHS provides an acceptable alternative to mCC for adult smokers.

      Trial Registration: NCT01989156 (ClinicalTrials.gov).

      Related Publications

      Comparison of Abdominal Aortic Aneurysm Growth in Adult Smoking Patients Who Either Switch to IQOS, Continue Smoking, or Quit Smoking

      Clinical

      Systematic review of the relation between smokeless tobacco and cancer of the pancreas in Europe and North America

      Clinical

      Reduced exposure to Harmful and Potentially Harmful Constituents after 90 days of use of Tobacco Heating System 2.2 Menthol in Japan: A comparison with continued cigarette use or smoking abstinence

      Clinical

      Reduced Exposure To Harmful And Potentially Harmful Constituents after 90 Days Of Use Of Tobacco Heating System 2.2 Menthol In Japan: A Comparison With Continued Cigarette Use Or Smoking Abstinence

      Clinical

      Psychometric Evaluation of the mCEQ applied to Cigarettes and Heat-Not-Burn Products in the US and Japan

      Clinical

      Pharmacokinetics Of Nicotine And Subjective Effects Following The Single Use Of A Non-Menthol And Menthol Version Of Tobacco Heating System 2.2 In Two Studies In Japan: A Comparison With Single Use Of A Combustible Cigarette And Nicotine Gum

      Clinical

      PMIScience.com is operated by Philip Morris International for the purpose of publishing and disseminating scientific information about Philip Morris International’s efforts in support of its smoke-free product portfolio. This site is a global site for use by scientists, the public health and regulatory communities, and other stakeholders with an interest in tobacco policy. The purpose of this site is not advertising or marketing, nor is it directed at any specific market. It is not intended for use by consumers. New tobacco products sold in the United States are subject to FDA regulation; therefore the content of this site is not intended to make, and nor should it be construed as making, any product related claims in the United States without proper FDA authorization. ​
      ​
      Reduced Risk Products ("RRPs”) is the term we use to refer to products that present, are likely to present, or have the potential to present less risk of harm to smokers who switch to these products versus continuing smoking. PMI has a range of RRPs in various stages of development, scientific assessment and commercialization. All of our RRPs are smoke-free products that deliver nicotine with far lower quantities of harmful and potentially harmful constituents than found in cigarette smoke.