Peer-Reviewed Publications

      E-vapor aerosols do not compromise bone integrity relative to cigarette smoke after 6-month inhalation in an ApoE-/- mouse model

      Reumann, M. K.; Schaefer, J.; Titz, B.; Aspera-Werz, R. H.; Wong, E. T.; Szostak, J.; Häussling, V.; Ehnert, S.; Leroy, P.; Tan, W. T.; Kuczaj, A.; Audretsch, C.; Springer, F.; Badke, A.; Augat, P.; Quentanilla-Fend, L.; Martella, M.; Lee, K. M.; Peitsch, M. C.; Hoeng, J.; Nussler, A. K.

      Published
      May 14, 2020
      DOI
      10.1007/s00204-020-02769-4
      PMID
      32409933
      Link to publication
      Topic
      Summary

      Cigarette smoke (CS) exposure is one of the leading risk factors for human health. Nicotine-containing inhalable products, such as e-cigarettes, can effectively support tobacco harm reduction approaches. However, there are limited comparative data on the effects of the aerosols generated from electronic vapor products (e-vapor) and CS on bone. Here, we report the effects of e-vapor aerosols and CS on bone morphology, structure, and strength in a 6-month inhalation study. Eight-week-old ApoE–/– mice were exposed to aerosols from three different e-vapor formulations—CARRIER (propylene glycol and vegetable glycerol), BASE (CARRIER and nicotine), TEST (BASE and flavor)—to CS from 3R4F reference cigarettes at matched nicotine concentrations (35 µg/L) or to fresh air (Sham) (N = 10 per group). Tibiae were analyzed for bone morphology by µCT imaging, biomechanics by three-point bending, and by histological analysis. CS inhalation caused a significant decrease in cortical and total bone volume fraction and bone density relative to e-vapor aerosols. Additionally, CS exposure caused a decrease in ultimate load and stiffness. In contrast, bone structural and biomechanical parameters were not significantly affected by e-vapor aerosol or Sham exposure. At the dissection time point, there was no significant difference in body weight or tibia bone weight or length among the groups. Histological findings revealed microcracks in cortical bone areas among all exposed groups compared to Sham control. In conclusion, because of the bone-preserving effect of e-vapor aerosols relative to CS exposure, e-vapor products could potentially constitute less harmful alternatives to cigarettes in situations in which bone health is of importance.

      Related Publications

      A comparative assessment of HPHC yields and in vitro toxicity for 1R6F reference cigarette smoke versus aerosol generated by Tobacco Heating System 3.0

      Pre-clinical Toxicology

      Cigarette smoke enhances abdominal aortic aneurysm formation in angiotensin II-treated apolipoprotein E-deficient mice

      Pre-clinical Toxicology

      Tobacco Heating System 2.4 has less harmful impact on 2D bone co-culture system than cigarette smoke

      Pre-clinical Toxicology

      Characterizing the Genotoxic Potential of E-Cigarette Components In Vitro

      Pre-clinical Toxicology

      Evaluation of Chronic Toxicity and Carcinogenicity of Flavored E-Vapor Aerosols in an 18-Month Inhalation Study in A/J Mice

      Pre-clinical Toxicology

      Toxicological Assessment of Highly Mentholated Reduced-Risk Tobacco Products in Sprague Dawley Rats Following Sub-Chronic Inhalation Exposure

      Pre-clinical Toxicology

      PMIScience.com is operated by Philip Morris International for the purpose of publishing and disseminating scientific information about Philip Morris International’s efforts in support of its smoke-free product portfolio. This site is a global site for use by scientists, the public health and regulatory communities, and other stakeholders with an interest in tobacco policy. The purpose of this site is not advertising or marketing, nor is it directed at any specific market. It is not intended for use by consumers. New tobacco products sold in the United States are subject to FDA regulation; therefore the content of this site is not intended to make, and nor should it be construed as making, any product related claims in the United States without proper FDA authorization. ​
      ​
      Reduced Risk Products ("RRPs”) is the term we use to refer to products that present, are likely to present, or have the potential to present less risk of harm to smokers who switch to these products versus continuing smoking. PMI has a range of RRPs in various stages of development, scientific assessment and commercialization. All of our RRPs are smoke-free products that deliver nicotine with far lower quantities of harmful and potentially harmful constituents than found in cigarette smoke.