Peer-Reviewed Publications

      Comparison of the pharmacokinetics of nicotine following single and ad libitum use of a Tobacco Heating System or combustible cigarettes

      Picavet, P.; Haziza, C.; Lama, N.; Weitkunat, R.; Lüdicke, F.

      Published
      Oct 5, 2015
      DOI
      10.1093/ntr/ntv220
      PMID
      26438645
      Link to publication
      Topic
      Summary

      Introduction: We aimed to compare the pharmacokinetics of nicotine between the heat-not-burn Tobacco Heating System 2.1 (THS 2.1) and combustible cigarettes (CCs). We also examined whether the subjective urge to smoke was associated with the pharmacokinetics of nicotine.

      Methods: This open-label, randomized, two-period, two-sequence crossover study conducted in 28 healthy smokers assessed the pharmacokinetics of nicotine after single and ad libitum use of the THS 2.1 or CCs. During the 7-day confinement period, blood samples were drawn for pharmacokinetic analysis. Subjective effects related to THS 2.1 or CC use were assessed using the Questionnaire of Smoking Urges (QSU-brief).

      Results: The nicotine delivery rate was similar with the THS 2.1 and CCs after single and ad libitum use. The time to the maximum nicotine concentration was 8 min after single use of the THS 2.1 and CCs. The time to the peak concentration following ad libitum use was similar between the THS 2.1 and CCs. The maximum plasma nicotine concentration after using the THS 2.1 was 8.4 ng/mL, 70.3% of that obtained with CCs. A transient reduction from baseline in the urge to smoke of 40% was observed 15 min after the single use of both the THS 2.1 and CCs. The mean QSU-Brief total scores following single and ad libitum use were similar for the THS 2.1 and CCs.

      Conclusions: These results suggest that the THS 2.1 effectively delivers nicotine and achieves similar pharmacokinetic profiles to CCs. The THS 2.1 also reduced the urge to smoke similarly to CCs.

      Implications: Reducing exposure to toxicants and safer delivery of nicotine are among the strategies that may reduce the harm of smoking-related diseases. In the present study, we investigated the pharmacokinetics of nicotine and their effects on the urge to smoke using the THS 2.1. It was developed to replicate the ritual of smoking as closely as possible by providing nicotine in a way that mimics CC smoking, but limits pyrolysis and combustion by heating tobacco at a much lower temperature than CCs (heat-not-burn).

      Related Publications

      Comparison of Abdominal Aortic Aneurysm Growth in Adult Smoking Patients Who Either Switch to IQOS, Continue Smoking, or Quit Smoking

      Clinical

      Systematic review of the relation between smokeless tobacco and cancer of the pancreas in Europe and North America

      Clinical

      Reduced exposure to Harmful and Potentially Harmful Constituents after 90 days of use of Tobacco Heating System 2.2 Menthol in Japan: A comparison with continued cigarette use or smoking abstinence

      Clinical

      Reduced Exposure To Harmful And Potentially Harmful Constituents after 90 Days Of Use Of Tobacco Heating System 2.2 Menthol In Japan: A Comparison With Continued Cigarette Use Or Smoking Abstinence

      Clinical

      Psychometric Evaluation of the mCEQ applied to Cigarettes and Heat-Not-Burn Products in the US and Japan

      Clinical

      Pharmacokinetics Of Nicotine And Subjective Effects Following The Single Use Of A Non-Menthol And Menthol Version Of Tobacco Heating System 2.2 In Two Studies In Japan: A Comparison With Single Use Of A Combustible Cigarette And Nicotine Gum

      Clinical

      PMIScience.com is operated by Philip Morris International for the purpose of publishing and disseminating scientific information about Philip Morris International’s efforts in support of its smoke-free product portfolio. This site is a global site for use by scientists, the public health and regulatory communities, and other stakeholders with an interest in tobacco policy. The purpose of this site is not advertising or marketing, nor is it directed at any specific market. It is not intended for use by consumers. New tobacco products sold in the United States are subject to FDA regulation; therefore the content of this site is not intended to make, and nor should it be construed as making, any product related claims in the United States without proper FDA authorization. ​
      ​
      Reduced Risk Products ("RRPs”) is the term we use to refer to products that present, are likely to present, or have the potential to present less risk of harm to smokers who switch to these products versus continuing smoking. PMI has a range of RRPs in various stages of development, scientific assessment and commercialization. All of our RRPs are smoke-free products that deliver nicotine with far lower quantities of harmful and potentially harmful constituents than found in cigarette smoke.